They sang THINK FOR YOURSELF.
Not THINK LIKE THE BEATLES you fucking retards. I don’t mean you, of course.
To those I do mean:
Do you know or believe anything your teachers and professors haven’t told you? Can you even THINK about politics or art without someone else’s help? Is it that hard to investigate something on your own? Is it that hard to not be a FUCKING SOCK PUPPET?. All you for whom Rage Against the Machine and the Daily Show are exulted prophets that inform 80% of what you believe are no better than Rush Limbaugh listeners. Realize that and you’ll have started to wake up. Maybe.
I honestly can’t decide who I’m more pissed off at – those who are clumsily and enthusiastically attacking Ben Stein’s new movie on intelligent design, or Stein himself for making a movie that’s so easy to attack. The former group is made up of a sad collection of critics who are hurling themselves at the chance to write something “relevant.” Awkward, sometimes embarrassing attempts at hip, lacerating sarcasm or an overturning of the film’s “logic” are characteristic. They’ll quote one interviewee and then quote something Stein said and chalk it up to one more hole in their new paper target. THIS is faulty reasoning. If there was any “point” or “argument” one was meant to come away thinking Stein believed in (and that wasn’t “people should be able to talk about intelligent design without being FIRED”), it would be a God-and-science reconciling “Inherit the Wind” style religion or spirituality(since when is that offensive to hollywood liberals anyway?). Beyond that and some suggestions made after a severely ill-advised turn about halfway-through, the film is only expressing concern about a climate that is NAKEDLY HOSTILE to certain kinds of ideas. And it is!
I saw the damn movie, I didn’t agree with the damn movie, but this bullshit has got to stop. One reviewer said Michael Moore was smarter than Ben Stein. Ben Stein was a law professor. He is as rich as Jesus because of his financial acumen. Sure he was a Nixon speechwriter ($$), sure he’s a known republican. But from what I’ve seen he’s better read and less fanatical than just about any other Hollywood ideologue that comes to mind. Michael Moore is not smarter than Ben Stein. Nor does he look as sharp in a suit and sneakers. From where I’m standing, that look works all day.
My right-wing battering ram of a dad invited me to see this movie, which I’d never even heard of. Indeed I checked for it on metacritic. It didn’t seem to exist, and still has yet to appear. (responses I’ve read were mostly from rottentomatoes.com)
The film first seemed like a somewhat lighthearted investigation of a bias in the scientific community against proponents of “ID”. Reviewers have mistakenly claimed that because ID isn’t “science” (which it isn’t) that the film is somehow backward or fundamentally wrong. THAT is an example of the “specious” reasoning these tards love to think they’re debunking so adroitly.
The entire point of the film was that ID has been demonized, essentially outlawed, and that any cursory mention of the idea can mean career-death. Anyone who doesn’t believe that a notion like Intelligent Design (one unfairly associated with right-wing thinking) can bring down the wrath of the academia is kidding themselves. Anyone who doesn’t think a left-leaning bias isn’t spoon-fed to students at 90% of universities in America IS KIDDING THEMSELVES.
And anybody who thinks that by pointing that fact out, I somehow am condoning or supporting the right, is perfectly exemplifying the kind of braindead dickbasket I’m railing against here. Do I have a problem with the liberalization of students? I mostly agree with liberal ideas and social policy. But is it fair? Answer Nobody fucking CARES if it’s fair as long as it’s unfair in their favor. Are any of us ACTUALLY concerned with an unimpeded flow of ideas? I should think a whole lot fewer than would wear a fucking t-shirt that says they are.
Ben fucked up when he got all heavy-handed and tried to make a direct connection between Eugenics/Nazi-style fascism and Darwinism. But the unspoken connection that all these piss-brained reviewers are making between Intelligent Design and racism/homophobia/theocracy involves about .05% as much sense. After all, the most damning stuff was QUOTED from Darwin’s writings. He had some scary and dangerous ideas! SORRY. I know he came up with evolution. SORRY YEAH that sounds like right-wing talk-radio. SORRY. IT’S FUCKING TRUE. SOMETIMES THINGS ARE TRUE.
Chemical evolution, or the occurrence of life from its absence by natural processes, is as hazy, convoluted, nonsensical, straining and overreaching a set of propositions as you are likely to ever find, ever. Anywhere. As an origin-of-life tale, it BARELY outstrips the garden, the snake and the apple. I’m serious.
I’m not pointing that out because I think we should look for ways to believe in God. I don’t believe in God. I’m pointing it out because all these smug cocksuckers who wouldn’t last eight seconds before they were completely eviscerated by Ben Stein’s droll but knifelike technique need to stop being childish and unoriginal and pathetic. You’re nothing but a line of colorful and well-versed little parrots.

























